Ask

Claude Fable 5.1 vs davinci-002

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Claude Fable 5.1 Cost
$20.00
davinci-002 Cost
$2.40
davinci-002 is 88% cheaper
FeatureClaude Fable 5.1davinci-002
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price (1M)$10.00$2.00
Output Price (1M)$50.00$2.00
Context Window1,000,00016,384

Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens. davinci-002 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. davinci-002 is 80% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.1. For output tokens, davinci-002 is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M vs $50.00.

On context window, Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Claude Fable 5.1

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

When to choose davinci-002

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 2.00/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — davinci-002 generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with OpenAI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than davinci-002?

davinci-002 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00/1M vs $10.00/1M for Claude Fable 5.1 — a 80% saving.

What is the context window of Claude Fable 5.1 vs davinci-002?

Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1,000,000-token context window. davinci-002 has a 16,384-token context window. Claude Fable 5.1 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Claude Fable 5.1 or davinci-002?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, davinci-002 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.