Ask

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Claude Opus 4.7 Cost
$10.00
Llama 4 Scout Cost
$0.16
Llama 4 Scout is 98% cheaper
FeatureClaude Opus 4.7Llama 4 Scout
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input Price (1M)$5.00$0.10
Output Price (1M)$25.00$0.30
Context Window1,000,00010,000,000

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout is 98% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4.7. For output tokens, Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M vs $25.00.

On context window, Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Claude Opus 4.7

  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

When to choose Llama 4 Scout

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.10/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Llama 4 Scout generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Meta

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10/1M vs $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.7 — a 98% saving.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1,000,000-token context window. Llama 4 Scout has a 10,000,000-token context window. Llama 4 Scout supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Scout?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.