Ask

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Claude Opus 4 Cost
$30.00
Qwen3.5-Flash Cost
$0.18
Qwen3.5-Flash is 99% cheaper
FeatureClaude Opus 4Qwen3.5-Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input Price (1M)$15.00$0.10
Output Price (1M)$75.00$0.40
Context Window200,0001,000,000

Verdict

Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00 per 1M input tokens and $75.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash is 99% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4. For output tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M vs $75.00.

On context window, Qwen3.5-Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Claude Opus 4

  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

When to choose Qwen3.5-Flash

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.10/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Qwen3.5-Flash generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Alibaba

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10/1M vs $15.00/1M for Claude Opus 4 — a 99% saving.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.5-Flash?

Claude Opus 4 has a 200,000-token context window. Qwen3.5-Flash has a 1,000,000-token context window. Qwen3.5-Flash supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Claude Opus 4 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Qwen3.5-Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.