Ask

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs davinci-002

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Cost
$6.00
davinci-002 Cost
$2.40
davinci-002 is 60% cheaper
FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5davinci-002
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price (1M)$3.00$2.00
Output Price (1M)$15.00$2.00
Context Window200,00016,384

Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. davinci-002 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. davinci-002 is 33% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Sonnet 4.5. For output tokens, davinci-002 is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M vs $15.00.

On context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Claude Sonnet 4.5

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

When to choose davinci-002

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 2.00/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — davinci-002 generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with OpenAI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 cheaper than davinci-002?

davinci-002 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00/1M vs $3.00/1M for Claude Sonnet 4.5 — a 33% saving.

What is the context window of Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs davinci-002?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 200,000-token context window. davinci-002 has a 16,384-token context window. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or davinci-002?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, davinci-002 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.