Ask

davinci-002 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

davinci-002 Cost
$2.40
Claude Opus 4.6 Cost
$10.00
davinci-002 is 76% cheaper
Featuredavinci-002Claude Opus 4.6
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input Price (1M)$2.00$5.00
Output Price (1M)$2.00$25.00
Context Window16,3841,000,000

Verdict

davinci-002 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens. davinci-002 is 60% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4.6. For output tokens, davinci-002 is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M vs $25.00.

On context window, Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose davinci-002

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 2.00/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — davinci-002 generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with OpenAI

When to choose Claude Opus 4.6

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is davinci-002 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6?

davinci-002 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00/1M vs $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.6 — a 60% saving.

What is the context window of davinci-002 vs Claude Opus 4.6?

davinci-002 has a 16,384-token context window. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000-token context window. Claude Opus 4.6 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: davinci-002 or Claude Opus 4.6?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, davinci-002 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.