Ask

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

GLM-4.7-FlashX Cost
$0.15
Kimi K2.7 Code Cost
$1.75
GLM-4.7-FlashX is 91% cheaper
FeatureGLM-4.7-FlashXKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderZhipu AIMoonshot AI
Input Price (1M)$0.07$0.95
Output Price (1M)$0.40$4.00
Context Window202,752262,144

Verdict

GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM-4.7-FlashX is 93% cheaper on input tokens than Kimi K2.7 Code. For output tokens, GLM-4.7-FlashX is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M vs $4.00.

On context window, Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262,144 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose GLM-4.7-FlashX

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.07/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GLM-4.7-FlashX generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI

When to choose Kimi K2.7 Code

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (262,144 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Moonshot AI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GLM-4.7-FlashX cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07/1M vs $0.95/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code — a 93% saving.

What is the context window of GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Kimi K2.7 Code?

GLM-4.7-FlashX has a 202,752-token context window. Kimi K2.7 Code has a 262,144-token context window. Kimi K2.7 Code supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: GLM-4.7-FlashX or Kimi K2.7 Code?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, GLM-4.7-FlashX is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262,144 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.