Ask

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

GLM-5.2 Cost
$2.28
Claude Opus 4.6 Cost
$10.00
GLM-5.2 is 77% cheaper
FeatureGLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.6
ProviderZhipu AIAnthropic
Input Price (1M)$1.40$5.00
Output Price (1M)$4.40$25.00
Context Window1,000,0001,000,000

Verdict

GLM-5.2 costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM-5.2 is 72% cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4.6. For output tokens, GLM-5.2 is the more affordable option at $4.40/1M vs $25.00.

On context window, GLM-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose GLM-5.2

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 1.40/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GLM-5.2 generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI

When to choose Claude Opus 4.6

  • ✓ You are already integrated with Anthropic

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GLM-5.2 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6?

GLM-5.2 is cheaper on input tokens at $1.40/1M vs $5.00/1M for Claude Opus 4.6 — a 72% saving.

What is the context window of GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6?

GLM-5.2 has a 1,000,000-token context window. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-5.2 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: GLM-5.2 or Claude Opus 4.6?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, GLM-5.2 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, GLM-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.