GLM-5 vs GPT-4.1 mini
Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.
Updated September 2026
Cost Simulator
| Feature | GLM-5 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | OpenAI |
| Input Price (1M) | $1.00 | $0.40 |
| Output Price (1M) | $3.20 | $1.60 |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
Verdict
GLM-5 costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $3.20 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40 per 1M input tokens and $1.60 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4.1 mini is 60% cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5. For output tokens, GPT-4.1 mini is the more affordable option at $1.60/1M vs $3.20.
On context window, GLM-5 supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.
When to choose GLM-5
- ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI
When to choose GPT-4.1 mini
- ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.40/1M)
- ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GPT-4.1 mini generates text cheaper
- ✓ You are already integrated with OpenAI
Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLM-5 cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini? ▼
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper on input tokens at $0.40/1M vs $1.00/1M for GLM-5 — a 60% saving.
What is the context window of GLM-5 vs GPT-4.1 mini? ▼
GLM-5 has a 1,000,000-token context window. GPT-4.1 mini has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-5 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.
Which model is better: GLM-5 or GPT-4.1 mini? ▼
The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, GPT-4.1 mini is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, GLM-5 supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.