Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) vs GLM-5.2 (Fireworks)
Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.
Updated September 2026
Cost Simulator
| Feature | Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) | GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Fireworks AI | Fireworks AI |
| Input Price (1M) | $0.95 | $1.40 |
| Output Price (1M) | $4.00 | $4.40 |
| Context Window | 262,000 | 1,000,000 |
Verdict
Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) costs $0.95 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens. Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) is 32% cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.2 (Fireworks). For output tokens, Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) is the more affordable option at $4.00/1M vs $4.40.
On context window, GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.
When to choose Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks)
- ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.95/1M)
- ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) generates text cheaper
- ✓ You are already integrated with Fireworks AI
When to choose GLM-5.2 (Fireworks)
- ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
- ✓ You are already integrated with Fireworks AI
Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) cheaper than GLM-5.2 (Fireworks)? ▼
Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.95/1M vs $1.40/1M for GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) — a 32% saving.
What is the context window of Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) vs GLM-5.2 (Fireworks)? ▼
Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) has a 262,000-token context window. GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.
Which model is better: Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) or GLM-5.2 (Fireworks)? ▼
The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Kimi K2.6 (Fireworks) is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, GLM-5.2 (Fireworks) supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.