Ask

Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.5

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated August 2026

Cost Simulator

Kimi K3 Cost
$6.00
Kimi K2.5 Cost
$1.20
Kimi K2.5 is 80% cheaper
FeatureKimi K3Kimi K2.5
ProviderMoonshot AIMoonshot AI
Input Price (1M)$3.00$0.60
Output Price (1M)$15.00$3.00
Context Window1,000,000262,144

Verdict

Kimi K3 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60 per 1M input tokens and $3.00 per 1M output tokens. Kimi K2.5 is 80% cheaper on input tokens than Kimi K3. For output tokens, Kimi K2.5 is the more affordable option at $3.00/1M vs $15.00.

On context window, Kimi K3 supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Kimi K3

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Moonshot AI

When to choose Kimi K2.5

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.60/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Kimi K2.5 generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Moonshot AI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.60/1M vs $3.00/1M for Kimi K3 — a 80% saving.

What is the context window of Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K3 has a 1,000,000-token context window. Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144-token context window. Kimi K3 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Kimi K3 or Kimi K2.5?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Kimi K2.5 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Kimi K3 supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.