Ask

Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-4.7-FlashX

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Llama 4 Maverick Cost
$0.36
GLM-4.7-FlashX Cost
$0.15
GLM-4.7-FlashX is 58% cheaper
FeatureLlama 4 MaverickGLM-4.7-FlashX
ProviderMetaZhipu AI
Input Price (1M)$0.20$0.07
Output Price (1M)$0.80$0.40
Context Window1,000,000202,752

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.80 per 1M output tokens. GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens. GLM-4.7-FlashX is 65% cheaper on input tokens than Llama 4 Maverick. For output tokens, GLM-4.7-FlashX is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M vs $0.80.

On context window, Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Llama 4 Maverick

  • ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Meta

When to choose GLM-4.7-FlashX

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.07/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GLM-4.7-FlashX generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than GLM-4.7-FlashX?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07/1M vs $0.20/1M for Llama 4 Maverick — a 65% saving.

What is the context window of Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-4.7-FlashX?

Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-4.7-FlashX has a 202,752-token context window. Llama 4 Maverick supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Llama 4 Maverick or GLM-4.7-FlashX?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, GLM-4.7-FlashX is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.