Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-5
Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.
Updated September 2026
Cost Simulator
| Feature | Llama 4 Maverick | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Zhipu AI |
| Input Price (1M) | $0.20 | $1.00 |
| Output Price (1M) | $0.80 | $3.20 |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.80 per 1M output tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $3.20 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is 80% cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5. For output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M vs $3.20.
On context window, Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.
When to choose Llama 4 Maverick
- ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.20/1M)
- ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Llama 4 Maverick generates text cheaper
- ✓ You are already integrated with Meta
When to choose GLM-5
- ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI
Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than GLM-5? ▼
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20/1M vs $1.00/1M for GLM-5 — a 80% saving.
What is the context window of Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-5? ▼
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-5 has a 1,000,000-token context window. Llama 4 Maverick supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.
Which model is better: Llama 4 Maverick or GLM-5? ▼
The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.