Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated April 2026

Cost Simulator

Llama 4 Scout Cost
$0.14
Llama 4 Maverick Cost
$0.27
Llama 4 Scout is 48% cheaper
FeatureLlama 4 ScoutLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderMetaMeta
Input Price (1M)$0.08$0.15
Output Price (1M)$0.30$0.60
Context Window10,000,0001,000,000

Verdict

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout is 47% cheaper on input tokens than Llama 4 Maverick. For output tokens, Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M vs $0.60.

On context window, Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Llama 4 Scout

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.08/1M)
  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — Llama 4 Scout generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Meta

When to choose Llama 4 Maverick

  • ✓ You are already integrated with Meta

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on input tokens at $0.08/1M vs $0.15/1M for Llama 4 Maverick — a 47% saving.

What is the context window of Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Scout has a 10,000,000-token context window. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,000,000-token context window. Llama 4 Scout supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Llama 4 Scout or Llama 4 Maverick?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.