Ask

Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.

Updated September 2026

Cost Simulator

Mistral Medium 3 Cost
$0.80
GPT-3.5 Turbo Cost
$0.80
Same cost at this usage
FeatureMistral Medium 3GPT-3.5 Turbo
ProviderMistralOpenAI
Input Price (1M)$0.40$0.50
Output Price (1M)$2.00$1.50
Context Window131,00016,385

Verdict

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Medium 3 is 20% cheaper on input tokens than GPT-3.5 Turbo. For output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M vs $2.00.

On context window, Mistral Medium 3 supports 131,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.

When to choose Mistral Medium 3

  • ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.40/1M)
  • ✓ You need a larger context window (131,000 tokens)
  • ✓ You are already integrated with Mistral

When to choose GPT-3.5 Turbo

  • ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GPT-3.5 Turbo generates text cheaper
  • ✓ You are already integrated with OpenAI

Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3 cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.40/1M vs $0.50/1M for GPT-3.5 Turbo — a 20% saving.

What is the context window of Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Mistral Medium 3 has a 131,000-token context window. GPT-3.5 Turbo has a 16,385-token context window. Mistral Medium 3 supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.

Which model is better: Mistral Medium 3 or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Mistral Medium 3 is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Mistral Medium 3 supports 131,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.