Qwen3.5-Plus vs GLM-4.7
Detailed pricing comparison and cost analysis.
Updated September 2026
Cost Simulator
| Feature | Qwen3.5-Plus | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Zhipu AI |
| Input Price (1M) | $0.40 | $0.60 |
| Output Price (1M) | $2.40 | $2.20 |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 204,800 |
Verdict
Qwen3.5-Plus costs $0.40 per 1M input tokens and $2.40 per 1M output tokens. GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 per 1M input tokens and $2.20 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5-Plus is 33% cheaper on input tokens than GLM-4.7. For output tokens, GLM-4.7 is the more affordable option at $2.20/1M vs $2.40.
On context window, Qwen3.5-Plus supports 1,000,000 tokens — meaning it can fit more conversation history, documents, or code in a single request. This matters for RAG pipelines, long document analysis, and agentic workflows where context builds up over many turns.
When to choose Qwen3.5-Plus
- ✓ You need the lowest input token cost ($ 0.40/1M)
- ✓ You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
- ✓ You are already integrated with Alibaba
When to choose GLM-4.7
- ✓ Your workload is output-heavy — GLM-4.7 generates text cheaper
- ✓ You are already integrated with Zhipu AI
Use the calculator above to simulate your specific workload and find the exact break-even point. For most applications, the cheapest model is the one that minimises your total monthly bill given your input-to-output token ratio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Qwen3.5-Plus cheaper than GLM-4.7? ▼
Qwen3.5-Plus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.40/1M vs $0.60/1M for GLM-4.7 — a 33% saving.
What is the context window of Qwen3.5-Plus vs GLM-4.7? ▼
Qwen3.5-Plus has a 1,000,000-token context window. GLM-4.7 has a 204,800-token context window. Qwen3.5-Plus supports the larger context, suitable for longer documents and agentic workflows.
Which model is better: Qwen3.5-Plus or GLM-4.7? ▼
The best choice depends on your use case. For cost efficiency on input tokens, Qwen3.5-Plus is the cheaper option. For maximum context length, Qwen3.5-Plus supports 1,000,000 tokens. Use the comparison table above to find the right fit for your workload.